< img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=696062565948397&ev=PageView&noscript=1" />

Rubber Tracks Picking Up Fresh Asphalt Binder: Documenting Transfer Before Cleanup or Re-Crossing

Keep your machine moving — rubber tracks that fit, in stock and ready to ship.

Rubber Tracks Picking Up Fresh Asphalt Binder: Documenting Transfer Before Cleanup or Re-Crossing
Posted on by John White

If rubber tracks pick up fresh asphalt binder, document two things separately: the binder on the track, and what happened to the new asphalt surface. Then get the surface condition, cure stage and travel path from the paving authority before anyone cleans the tracks or crosses the area again. The pickup tells you binder is present. It does not tell you whether the surface is damaged or why.

Work out which binder it is

"Fresh asphalt binder" can describe several materials, and the source changes who needs to be told.

  • Tack coat is a thin spray of asphalt, usually an emulsion, applied before an overlay so the layers bond. The Missouri DOT engineering policy guide says that until the emulsion has set there is a risk of tack coat tracking off when construction equipment drives on the tacked surface. RoadResource.org says tack can be partly removed by tires or tracks, and that adjoining surfaces can be marked with it.

  • Trackless tack is a product designed to resist pickup. TarmacView describes it as polymer-modified emulsion with a less tacky residual film. A crossing over trackless tack is no guarantee of a clean result, and you shouldn't assume the product was used.

  • Binder at the surface of an existing pavement can be soft or tacky. The NZ Transport Agency says that in hot weather the binder in a flushed surface can become sticky and soft, leading to pick-up and tracking. FHWA describes bleeding as excess asphalt migrating to the surface. This is a pavement condition and may be unrelated to your crossing.

  • Newly placed hot mix still cooling or lightly cured is another possibility. Paving-industry sources say that opening heavy traffic too soon can lead to scuffing, rutting and surface damage. A TRID abstract of a research paper says freshly paved asphalt must be sufficiently cool before it is trafficked, to prevent premature failure.

Don't decide which of these applies from the track alone. Ask the paving authority or contractor what was placed, when, and whether tack or a trackless product was used.

Document the track and the surface separately

Do any physical inspection under the machine's own procedure and the site's controls. Photograph from a safe position. Don't approach moving components or place yourself under unsupported equipment.

This card keeps the transfer apart from changes to the pavement.

Observation Possible reading What stays open
Black, sticky material on track lugs or contact faces Binder transfer to the track Which material it is, and how much came from the surface
Dark film or smear left on the adjacent pavement Transfer from track to a neighbouring surface Whether it can be removed without harming the surface
Recessed track pattern in the new surface Possible indentation Permanence, and whether it relates to temperature, cure stage or load
Torn, pulled-up or peeled areas where the surface looks missing Possible displacement or tearing of the new layer Cause. Binder pickup can accompany tearing without proving it
Roughened or polished patches Possible abrasion Cause
Loose stones or exposed aggregate Possible displaced aggregate, if it came from this surface Whether stones came from elsewhere
Cracking at or near the crossing Cracking is present Whether it pre-dates the crossing
Marks overlapping joints, patches or earlier wear Unresolved Any single cause

Record track photographs with the machine identified, the contact areas visible, and the date and time. Record surface photographs from wide to close, with a scale reference, and mark the location of each on a simple sketch.

Facts to obtain before cleanup or another crossing

The paving authority holds information you can't infer from the machine. Ask for the following and write down the answers with the name and role of the person who gave them.

  • What was placed at that location: new hot mix, a tack coat, a surface treatment or an older surface.

  • When it was placed, and its current condition as the authority understands it.

  • Whether tack was a conventional emulsion or a trackless product, and whether it had set.

  • Whether the authority has an opening or cure requirement for that location, and whether it considers the surface open to your machine.

  • The approved travel path, including turning areas, and whether your crossing followed it.

  • Weather and surface temperature at the time, if the authority recorded them.

  • Who should clean the tracks and the surface, and by what method.

Those answers decide whether another crossing is permitted at all. Don't use published guideline timelines in place of the authority's answer. The paving sources found here describe general practice for construction equipment and traffic, and none of them is written for tracked machines. Different mixes, products and weather give different results.

Cleanup and re-crossing

Don't clean first. Cleaning removes the evidence of what was transferred, and solvents or abrasive methods can themselves affect asphalt, rubber or both. The sources I found don't give a verified method for cleaning binder off rubber tracks. Ask the track and machine manufacturer for guidance on compatible cleaners and procedures, and follow the site's rules for materials and runoff.

Don't cross the area again until the paving authority has answered the points above. If binder has already moved onto the track, a repeat crossing can move it onto more surface. Some tack-coat guidance describes sand being applied to blot tack and stop pickup by traffic. That is a paving-authority decision about the pavement. It is not a step for an operator to improvise.

Classifying the result

Use three outcomes.

  • Transfer or contamination: binder is on the track or lies as a film on the surface, and no indentation, tearing, displaced aggregate or cracking is visible. The paving authority's answers support the reading.

  • Physical surface damage: you can see indentation, abrasion, tearing, displaced aggregate or cracking. Describe it in those terms and leave the cause open.

  • Unresolved: the evidence doesn't separate transfer from damage, the surface history is unknown, or existing conditions overlap the marks.

Before the next move, keep the dated photographs of the track and surface, the sketch of the travel path and marked areas, the written answers from the paving authority, the machine and track identification, and a note of anything you didn't see. Nobody should clean, repair or recross until that record exists.

Where the track fits in

If the record points to a recurring contact problem, the useful questions concern the machine and the surface, not just the track. Confirm the machine model, track size and manufacturer documentation first. AFTparts' Rubber Tracks collection is a route to the relevant category once you have those details. This article hasn't verified any listing, fitment or compound property there. Suitability for newly paved surfaces should come from the machine manufacturer, the product information and the paving authority.